Sandra at The Pythagoras Portal blog: COSMIC SCIENCE - A TYPOGRAPHICAL MAP TO OUR SYSTEM...

Sandra at The Pythagoras Portal blog: COSMIC SCIENCE - A TYPOGRAPHICAL MAP TO OUR SYSTEM...: "The theoretical approach to the cosmic soup derivation stands justified only by the formulated suggestions of entropy, amalgamated against a..."

COSMIC SCIENCE - A TYPOGRAPHICAL MAP TO OUR SYSTEM'S UNIVERSE...PART ONE:

The theoretical approach to the cosmic soup derivation stands justified only by the formulated suggestions of entropy, amalgamated against a backdrop of amorphous analogs. The conclusion in this theory relies on a somewhat illustrious notion of an ever expanding universe. If the set theory states that by principle the direct amount in a system’s energy can be calculated by the rate of expansion and contraction in verve, then surely the three state actions must be interchangeable. The system of entropy refers to a selective process whereby molecules scatter. To enhance this periphery of thought the adjunct accumulative endorses the notion of a new scale, where the boundaries and borders of outer space represent the new periphery. Telescopic magnification relies on the oblique angles of light, which magnify as refraction. Refractive light compounds the ether into meta-static fragments of light. The index for this refraction maintains some level of extractive whereby the measured index falls reticent to the line of indent, between the telescope and its scope of practice. This measures the index as a fragmented representation in line with spectroscopy. The order reassembles as the universe expanding because the line of communication is somewhat stilted. On the far side of the universe, the index measures a portending red-shift. A galaxy in making, red-shift is an area of isolation where plutonic debris measures on the index as a hotspot. Gamma- ray particles are associated to the red-shift phenomenon for their personal capacity to heat up the intensity on the spectroscope. The capacity for heat intends activation and is known as Newton’s zero- zone. A red-shift is a zone recollected to have magnetically attracted particles into its zone through magnetic induction. Red-shift or swift-zone is believed to engulf particles in order to acquire enough mass in degradation to eventually form a black hole. Black holes are believed to be the reverse synthesis of galaxies in orbit. They are presumed nuclear waste pit holes where dying galaxies are sucked into an inferno melting pot. The consumate of the red-shift is an ionization principle, where scattered debris forms the magnetic orbit for new poles. “Crompton’s Scattering” relies on this principle for heat waves. Magnetic induction forms the resolution for new orders and relies on the principle of adhesion in a super conductive field theory. The measurement of a system identifies with the law of superiors and degradables in situ. In an area where irradiation is excessively high, the excitation of molecules in measured in Coloumbs. Where the refractive index falls short in its area of expansion for potentials, the pervasive area indicates a resonance scale. Man can only detect within the levels of his instrumentation, and subsequently apply his theories accordingly. We measure according to theory, yet theory has no standing if not proven by measure? A refractive index is measured by angle of incidence. What we are measuring is the refractive incidence of a reflection. Since a reflection is quadrupled in a sphere, what we are measuring in refractive, is an eighth in the intensity of a reportable. By measuring diagnostics in this sphere, the consumate result will be one of accommodative supposition, where X will be the surface acquisition and Y the index by modulated index in an analysis. If all within the bodies in the universe revolve around an axis at a speed representative of their size and weight, how can it be that the extended universe is not subject to the same laws governed in entropy? Suppose the moon did not rotate around the earth at a three hundred and sixty degree angle, and suppose the earth did not turn in approximation to the moon, do you suppose there would be a sunset and a sunrise? Why is it that our present calendar reflects three hundred and sixty five days in the cyclical completion of a year when the axis of a rotund should imply three hundred and sixty revolutions? The implication of this delivers a five degree incline in the rotation of an axis. This measurement delivers a systematically off-centred ratio performing the circumference of a mathematical eccentric circle. Mathematical eccentricity delivers the cuneiform action of Pi. The eccentricity is a cuneiform that is subject to a field of centrifugation, delivered by an eccentric axis where the pivot is inclined at five degrees off centre. This would deliver the stance of the extra five days in classical cosmotology.  

LEARNING TO EXTEND THE MIND - DEVELOP YOUR OWN PROOF THEOREM

By the turn of the first century, the master Plato was theorising an element he called space. He postulated the etheric realm was the element in nature that managed the soul. The theory of heaven became 'divine space,' a place where the receptacle of God made divine embers, and the nature of soul represented time -as the earthbound relationship to sense. Plato intimated the stars as the essence of divine beings in heavenly abode. His divine ontology can be seen today as a protagonistic sense. Between heaven and earth, a place existed that managed the area above and below it as the primordial sound, mediating between realms. Plato speculated that the aether was a scintilla of the proximal ray, a place where the earth met the sun in a dew drop. The practical assimilation gives us grand design. The theory of connective synergy understands grand design as the assimilatory process of conceptual thinking. Understanding this relativism, the initial nature is a cosmic angularity, also understood as cosmic variance. To divine interpretation, the cosmic singularity presents a uniformity of presence. By implement faction, this sustains the universe...but by protagonistic sense, the design is perpetual in nature. To interpret the design, the initial understanding of sense must be regarded foolproof. How do we divide sense from protagonist theory, to answer the design?