I have noticed that there is an emergence of the spiritually orientated minds. There are many levels of this orientation. Between the quickly evolving neophyte and the post-religious reformer, there are those seeking truth to a world- that just does not make sense to them anymore. There are also many ancient souls vibrating at the master level. There are even those who come as the spiritual 'midwives' to ease the transition into a new plane of delivered consciousness. There are the teachers and there are the scribes, and even those that help usher in the new developments of a more conscientious government. There is even the spiritual scientist, that having reached his plateau of learning, is in search of higher fields that fold the evolution into a multidisciplinary format...and open his chances of discovery. There are Indigo's that are savants of music and arts. Among all of these, there are two distinct types of personalities that distinguish between perspectives, in a distinguishing ability. In fact the division between dinstinguishing ability, is what curtails the strategists mind. Pythagoras first made sense of this as the 'pre-order of logic'. He maintained that the order of numbers had a pre-sequel and thus infinity could not be reached as it was attached to a prequel with a decimal squared. Infinity, he proposed, should be able to divide within itself to make smaller numbers and not multiple digits. The smaller numbers, he proposed as square root. The square root thus held within it, the smallest and the highest of fraction. In a dream one night he realised that the contribution to be able to philosophize numbers, lay within it's first perspective. The ability to distinguish same if not equal parentheez of a distribution by squaring the root, instead of adding the sum formula to distinguish know how. He formed logic out of synthesis, not incursion...and was able to see the pattern then follow it. Without seeing the pattern, you follow incursion and set precedence where the point of continuation can no longer see logic. When we cannot see logic, we continue to theorise along development rule and see no order that matters in a relationship. . . This is the synthesis equation that he formulated as fx (pi) the singular illusion, and made it into a quaternion with square root as the synthesis equation. 3(2) ^^ 33(2) x pi as the multifactorial - to the square root equivalent (OS). Once a week on the Sabath, Pythagoras and his friend would sit together and hypothesize on the philosophies which they had learned to interpret from their dreams. Each one would try to posit an approach to the other, upon which they would try to discredit each other's notion through contesting the superlatism of the notion. By the end of the day, neither of them could agree on each other's notion. Pythagoras decided to test his theory on superlatives, by making one tiny adjustment to his theory on conception as a prefix. He would use his own dream by comparrison, to find the similarity adjustment, instead of the dissimilar thread, to prove probable cause. The first line of comparrative became the second line of adjustment to form a similarity rule, by which opened up an array of qualifying sums... and he could see the pattern unfold instead of following the logic of prequel. He found the divinity in numbers to be the harmony in synthesis that could be extended by interpretation from transliteration. To conclude, my summary point is this... the distinguishing perspective is divided into two camps. Those whose first perspective is to find similarity in order, and others whose first perspective is to find the disparity in order, to prove their consequence right. If you choose to always begin by finding the similarity practice, the unity of order will reveal the symmetries that are directing towards the higher cause
No comments:
Post a Comment